Overall performance
Pearson correlations involving the fundamental research details (the major Five dimensions, depressive symptoms, life satisfaction and parenthood satisfaction) indicated that higher quantities of extraversion were somewhat synchronised having highest amounts of transparency to tackle, lifestyle satisfaction, and lower levels of depressive symptomatology (select Dining table dos). Neuroticism and you can depression membership were positively coordinated. Higher neuroticism along with is synchronised which have lower levels of conscientiousness, agreeableness, lifestyle pleasure, and you may parenthood fulfillment. High degrees of conscientiousness were coordinated that have low levels out-of depressive episodes and higher levels of existence fulfillment. Furthermore, high degrees of agreeableness was in fact correlated which have lower levels out-of depressive attacks and better quantities of lives pleasure. Higher levels of depressive symptomatology was correlated which have lower levels out-of lives pleasure and you can parenthood fulfillment.
Pairwise reviews revealed that gay men which became fathers due to surrogacy (Yards = 9
Correlations with the sociodemographic variables that served as controls in our study revealed that being older was significantly correlated with reports of worse physical health (r = ?0.28, p 2 = 0.055. When looking at the univariate effects (see Table 3), life satisfaction significantly differed among the three groups, F(2,176) = 4.827, p = 0.009, ?p 2 = 0.052. Pairwise comparisons revealed that gay men who became fathers through surrogacy (M = 5.31, SD = 1.16) scored significantly higher than heterosexual fathers (M = 4.70, SD = 1.39) on life satisfaction (p = 0.002), with no significant differences between gay men who became fathers through surrogacy and gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship (M = 5.18, SD = 1.08; p = 0.161) or between gay fathers who became fathers through https://datingmentor.org/pl/randki-z-artystami/ a heterosexual relationship and heterosexual fathers (p = 0.804).
Desk step three. Multivariate Studies regarding Covariance of Class (Gay Dads courtesy surrogacy, Gay Dads because of Heterosexual Relationship, and you may Heterosexual Dads) to own Emotional Wellness Concomitants (Years, Host to Beginning, Monetary Status, Self-Rated Health, Self-Rated Religiousness, Relationship Condition, Amount of College students, Kid’s Imply Years and Child’s Property Managed).
Univariate effects also showed that parenthood satisfaction significantly differed among the three groups, F(2,176) = 3.556, p = 0.031, ?p 2 = 0.039. 34, SD = 0.90) scored significantly higher than heterosexual fathers (M = 8.27, SD = 1.72) on parenthood satisfaction (p = 0.018), with no significant differences between gay men who became fathers through surrogacy and gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship (M = 8.03, SD = 1.72; p = 0.870) or between gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship and heterosexual fathers (p = 0.216). The differences between gay fathers through surrogacy and heterosexual fathers on life satisfaction and parenthood satisfaction remained significant when Bonferroni corrections were applied.
As the found in Dining table 3, univariate outcomes on the other hand indicated that depressive symptomology did not notably differed one of several around three groups, F(dos,step 176) = step 1.806, p = 0.167.
To check on all of our prediction one to gay dads owing to surrogacy would report large degrees of extraversion than just either heterosexual fathers or homosexual fathers compliment of a good heterosexual dating, i conducted univariate study out-of covariance (ANCOVA) with blog post hoc pairwise reviews. Analysis group (gay dads due to surrogacy; gay dads who’d end up being fathers as a result of a heterosexual dating; and you will heterosexual dads) served since the independent changeable, extraversion served because the founded varying, as well as the 9 sociodemographic details discover in order to notably disagree involving the fathers’ communities (many years, place of delivery, financial reputation, self-ranked wellness, self-rated religiousness, relationships reputation, amount of college students, youngsters suggest age, and you may guy property) were used due to the fact covariates.
The results displayed in Table 4 indicated that extraversion significantly differed among the three groups, F(2,179) = 4.182, p = 0.017, ?p 2 = 0.045. Pairwise comparisons revealed that gay men who became fathers through surrogacy (M = 3.64, SD = 0.72) scored significantly higher on extraversion than heterosexual fathers (M = 2.39, SD = 0.87; p = 0.006). Gay men who became fathers through surrogacy also scored significantly higher on extraversion than gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship (M = 3.50, SD = 0.69; p = 0.038). No significant difference was found between gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship and heterosexual fathers (p = 0.458). The differences between gay fathers through surrogacy and heterosexual fathers on extraversion remained significant when Bonferroni corrections were applied. However, the difference between gay fathers through surrogacy and gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship was non-significant.